资讯

Unfortunately, lawmakers repealed it in 1976. Bring back the three-panel court for constitutional challenges.
Constitutional rights have to be enforceable. They can’t rely on the goodwill of the government. This utter lack of accountability is a charter for abuse. And that abuse is happening right now.
Alito's concerns about "loopholes" in the Supreme Court's universal injunctions ruling emerge as judges issue sweeping ...
Yesterday, in a 6–3 decision in Trump v. CASA, the United States Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration in a case ...
President Donald Trump and his legal team eye next steps after the Supreme Court curbed lower court judges' ability to issue ...
The Supreme Court’s ruling in a case on birthright citizenship gave an ominous warning to those challenging other Trump ...
A federal injunction has frozen the July 1, 2025, DHS termination; Haiti-TPS work authorization currently runs to Feb. 3, 2026. The government has appealed and will seek a stay; employers may see the ...
Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan once opposed the practice of district judges issuing national injunctions before siding ...
"Now she voted against the decision on Friday. Just goes to show you that some of these folks really are hacks.” ...
A divided Supreme Court has ruled that individual judges lack the authority to grant nationwide injunctions, but the decision ...
Friday’s decision limits the circumstances under which the court can issue nationwide injunctions — orders that stop a federal law or policy from being enforced while court battles play out.