News
Alito's concerns about "loopholes" in the Supreme Court's universal injunctions ruling emerge as judges issue sweeping ...
Constitutional rights have to be enforceable. They can’t rely on the goodwill of the government. This utter lack of ...
President Donald Trump and his legal team eye next steps after the Supreme Court curbed lower court judges' ability to issue ...
By limiting the ability of a single judge to halt executive actions across the nation, the court has restored balance to the ...
Unfortunately, lawmakers repealed it in 1976. Bring back the three-panel court for constitutional challenges.
Politics and intellectual consistency go together like banana on pizza. But the reaction from Democrats to the recent Supreme ...
The Supreme Court’s ruling in a case on birthright citizenship gave an ominous warning to those challenging other Trump ...
7don MSNOpinion
Yesterday, in a 6–3 decision in Trump v. CASA, the United States Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration in a case ...
Friday’s decision limits the circumstances under which the court can issue nationwide injunctions — orders that stop a federal law or policy from being enforced while court battles play out.
Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan once opposed the practice of district judges issuing national injunctions before siding ...
Today's 6-3 Supreme Court decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc. barring nationwide injunctions is a grave mistake. It risks allowing the executive to engage in large-scale violations of constitutional ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results